Practical Rectification of Power Supply Conducted Emissions – Common-Mode Inductor Selection Case Study

Release time:

2026-10-10 10:31

I. Customer Case: Broadband Conducted Emissions Exceed the Limit for a 35 W Power Supply

The device under test employs a PI TOPSwitch switching‑mode power supply design. While the product functions as intended, broadband emissions exceeding limits were observed during conducted emission testing at the AC mains port:

Rectification and Results A 6.8 mH common-mode choke from Lika is connected in series at the input; retesting under the same conditions yielded a pass.

Figure 1: Conducted Emission Test Curve of the AC Power Port Before Remediation

II. Step 1: Spectrum Analysis—Precisely Identify the Characteristics of Excessive‑Limit Issues

The core premise of EMC remediation is to accurately identify noise characteristics, rather than indiscriminately adding filtering components. By dissecting spectral data, three key issues are clearly defined:

Frequency range: The broadband continuous emissions from 150 kHz to 10 MHz exceed the limits, indicating that this is not a problem confined to a single frequency or a narrowband signal.

Exceedance margin: It significantly exceeds the limits across the entire frequency band, with the highest level exceeding 23 dB ;

Rectification Objective: It effectively attenuates broadband noise in the 150 kHz–10 MHz range and provides a safety margin to account for device deviations, test errors, and operating‑condition variations.

Figure 2: Analysis of the Conducted Emission Test Curve from 150 kHz to 10 MHz

III. Step Two: Interference Source Tracing and Identification of the Core Noise Pattern

Conducted noise at communication ports is categorized into differential-mode interference and common-mode interference. These two types of noise have entirely different propagation paths and suppression strategies, and the filtering components must be matched to the specific interference mode in order to be effective.

3.1 Core Differences Between the Two Types of Noise

Differential-mode interference DM

The noise current forms a loop between the L and N lines, with the high-frequency currents in the two conductors flowing in opposite directions. Conventional solutions include common-mode inductors, ferrite beads, and X‑capacitors.

Common-mode interference CM

High-frequency currents propagate in the same direction along the L and N conductors, returning to the noise source via the enclosure, protective earth, or parasitic capacitance. The core solution is a common-mode choke, which can be paired with Y capacitors (subject to safety‑regulation limits on leakage current).

 

 

3.2 Qualitative Verification of Interference in This Case

The spectral characteristics of this case are as follows: the entire broadband range from 150 kHz to 10 MHz exceeds the limit, with the degree of exceedance exceeding 23 dB This is a typical characteristic of common-mode noise in switch-mode power supplies (while differential-mode noise tends to be concentrated at low frequencies and within narrow bands). Therefore, it is preferable to select… Common-mode inductor Rectification;

IV. Step 3: Determine the Basic Parameters of the Common-Mode Inductor

1. Operating Voltage

In this case, the maximum continuous input voltage is 265 VAC. The rated operating voltage, inter-winding withstand voltage, insulation resistance, creepage distance, and clearance of the candidate components must meet the requirements corresponding to the actual overvoltage category, pollution degree, and the overall equipment’s safety standards; selection should not be based solely on the nominal inductance value.

2. Rated Current, DCR, and Temperature Rise

The rated current shall be based on the maximum input RMS current under the minimum input voltage of 90 VAC, full-load conditions, and the highest ambient temperature, while accounting for conversion efficiency, power factor, inrush currents, and thermal dissipation. The device’s current‑carrying capability must also satisfy requirements related to DCR losses, winding temperature rise, and long‑term reliability.

3. Common-mode impedance and parasitic parameters of the target frequency band

6.8 mH represents only the low‑frequency inductance under the specified test conditions. For this case, the key comparisons should focus on the common‑mode impedance ZCM(f) and the insertion loss curves within the 150 kHz–10 MHz range, while also verifying the leakage inductance, inter‑winding capacitance, self‑resonant frequency, magnetic core material, physical dimensions, and temperature stability.

Selection Principles

Taking the common-mode impedance of the target frequency band as the primary design criterion, while simultaneously satisfying constraints on current rating, temperature rise, DCR, insulation coordination, and mounting space; the notion that “higher inductance always yields better filtering” cannot be used as a substitute for system-level verification.

The common-mode inductor recommended here is 6.8 mH , the specific parameters are as follows:

01 · Electrical Properties

02 · General Information & Certification

03 · Typical Impedance Characteristics

04 · Typical Attenuation Characteristics

Attenuation Requirements and Margin: Prior to remediation, the maximum exceedance was approximately 23 dB , the device’s attenuation capability should exceed 23 dB; increase by at least 6 dB After accounting for basic allowances, the minimum requirement is approximately 30 dB. Considering that the impedance/insertion loss curves in the datasheet are based on specified standard test conditions, the effective attenuation under actual loaded conditions may be reduced; therefore, for the target frequency band, approximately… 40 dB The selection is more reliable.

Insertion loss curve: In the target frequency range of 150 kHz–10 MHz, the attenuation is approximately 40 dB, ensuring compliance with regulatory limits and providing sufficient margin.

4. Installation Location and System Compatibility

The common-mode inductor is connected in series within the AC input circuit; both the L and N conductors must pass through both windings simultaneously, and no high-frequency bypass paths shall be formed.

The common-mode inductor should be positioned as close as possible to the noise source, and the high-frequency loop should be kept short to prevent high-frequency coupling between the input and output traces of the filter.

Figure 4: Location of the 6.8 mH common-mode choke L1 in the input filter network

For normal operating current: The currents in the L and N lines flow in opposite directions, causing the winding fluxes to largely cancel each other out; consequently, the common-mode inductor offers virtually no impedance to the power-frequency operating current.

For common-mode noise: The high-frequency currents in the L and N lines flow in the same direction, causing their magnetic fluxes to add constructively. As a result, the device exhibits a high common-mode impedance, providing strong suppression of common-mode noise.

V. Step Four: Conduct a Repeat A/B Test Under the Same Conditions

To eliminate interference from the test environment, this retest was conducted under strictly identical conditions—input voltage, full‑load current, LISN equipment, wiring configuration, detection mode, and test bandwidth—while only the common‑mode choke configuration was modified.

Group A (Before Rectification)

When the common-mode choke is not connected in series, broadband noise remains excessively high in the 150 kHz–10 MHz range, with a maximum excess of approximately… 23 dB , does not meet the EMC limit requirements.

Group A · Before remediation: Broadband noise from 150 kHz to 10 MHz consistently exceeded limits.

Group B (After Rectification)

After connecting a 6.8 mH common-mode choke in series, the measured emission levels across the 150 kHz–30 MHz range decreased overall and fell below the corresponding limit lines, indicating that this corrective measure has been successful.

Figure 5. Conducted emission test curve after connecting the Lika 6.8 mH common-mode choke in series.

Conclusion

When selecting a common-mode choke, do not rely solely on its nominal inductance. First, quantify the maximum allowable exceedance across the entire system, then add a safety margin and account for load‑dependent attenuation risks. Finally, perform system‑level verification by considering the common‑mode impedance or insertion loss, current rating, temperature rise, insulation requirements, and mounting constraints within the target frequency band.

⚙ Technical Support

Lika Electric Control can, based on operating voltage, maximum input current, target frequency band, insulation requirements, and installation constraints, provide common-mode choke impedance matching, structural design, sample validation, and custom development support.

Lika Electric Control ensures every transmission is more reliable.

Like · Save · Share — Let more cases be shared.

Follow “Likai Electric Control” to gain more practical EMC expertise and selection insights.

Related Downloads